The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 04, 2006, 05:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Tee or Garth

I've been trying to explain to a few fellow umpires some of what you both taught me about timing when calling the dish being an end result of the proper use of the eyes, as opposed to a hesitation. Sorry to say, I'm failing miserably at it and I would like to hear it once again from you.

This request is for you, Tee. Sometime in 05 you wrote a great post on monocular vision and how it applies to our avocation. Do you remember where that post was placed, and if not, would you expand on it again.


Thanks,


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 04, 2006, 09:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Does this help?

Gerry Davis stance

It is the only other thread with monocular vision that I found. Also from Oct. 2005.

Last edited by SAump; Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 09:35pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 04, 2006, 10:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
I've been trying to explain to a few fellow umpires some of what you both taught me about timing when calling the dish being an end result of the proper use of the eyes, as opposed to a hesitation. Sorry to say, I'm failing miserably at it and I would like to hear it once again from you.

This request is for you, Tee. Sometime in 05 you wrote a great post on monocular vision and how it applies to our avocation. Do you remember where that post was placed, and if not, would you expand on it again.


Thanks,


Tim.
As taught by the instructors at the Desert Classic and the Academy, it's actually quite simple in theory.

Two examples of timing being the proper use of the eyes.

BU:

BU in A. Batter hits grounder to third. BU hustles to get his 90 while keeping eye on ball. After he determines a quality throw has been made he gets set and looks for touch and listens for catch. After the play, his eyes go up from the bag to the ball. Only after finding the ball and seeing that it is indeed secure, he makes a call, which is a mental process. Then he signals, visually and verbally, his call.

No phony hesitation. No "two count" just proper use of eyes yielding excellent timing. Also no "OUT, no no, SAFE" calls.

PU:

PU tracks the pitch with his eyes all the way to the glove, being careful not to tunnel the ball, that is keeping eyes straight ahead and letting the ball travel through his field of vision and making absolutely certain he sees the catch. His eyes move to see the ball in the glove. He makes the call, again, a mental process, however prior to making his physical and verbal announcement of his call he continues to keep his eye on the ball in the glove as he rises. As he begins to make his physical and verbal "call" he then takes his eye off the ball.

Again, the continued and proper use of the eyes provide excellent timing with no phony counting or mumbling of any kind.

As I said, in theory, it's quite simple. The hard part is doing it right EVERY time and knowing when you are and aren't. Many students, including some D-1 folks were absolutely convinced they were doing as instructed until they saw their video tapes and witnessed their eyes leaving the ball or the glove before they should. Getting caught screwing up on the bases was easier. The instructor playing the first baseman would watch the students eyes and everytime they did not look up to find the ball, he'd drop the ball.

Everyone just KNOWS they are doing it correctly until they see for themselves that they are not. While the theory is simple, the practice is much more difficult than one would think and requires discipline for it to become habit.
__________________
GB

Last edited by GarthB; Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 10:46pm.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 05, 2006, 09:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
Nice explanation Garth.

Thank you!
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apology to Garth Benham Carl Childress Baseball 8 Fri Jul 09, 2004 07:32am
?is Garth ok? slightly off subject, but! Rog Baseball 1 Thu Mar 01, 2001 11:29pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1