And that was kinda my point in posting the article. Umpires need to be aware of multiple shots coming off the mask in close proximity, time wise. It can happen and one should be aware the concussion warning signs. Don't get all macho and ignore them.
The HSM stuff is secondary. Both types of masks offer similar impact protection from straight on balls. Past that, it's basically personal preference. I've just seen, heard of and had enough balls/bats come in contact with unprotected head areas that I wear a HSM. Your mileage may vary...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by socalblue1
Jeff,
Have you ever had three 90+ direct hits over a two day span? If so, what were the short and long term results?
It's a well know fact that head injuries aquired over a short span are cumlative (IE: three hits in a short span tend to cause more injury than three hits over a season).
Testing I have seen (Internal testing by a local manufacturer here in SoCal) between the HSM & regular mask indicate:
1. Direct hits have very similar results. Louder to wearer in the HSM.
2. Glancing hits are deflected somewhat better by the HSM
IMO the main reason to switch are view & side/top/rear protection. In many youth and HS fields the backstop is very close to the plate, resulting in an umpire potentially taking shots to the these areas.
|
Mon Aug 21, 2006, 03:53pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
