The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 17, 2006, 07:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3appleshigh
That said, in your stitch, Hit in the Back, there is movement, might be silly movement, but I'm going to give a base.
Not sure getting hit in the back is so silly.
99% of the batters are taught to turn inside and take the pitch in the back.
Much better than trying to back out and getting hit in the ribs or the arm.

If I get any movement at all, even a flinch, I give the base. If they stand still on a curve ball, no base, if they were wanting to swing, they would have movement. A batter who stands like a statue and lets a curve ball hit him had no intention of ever swinging and every intention of getting hit. no base!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 17, 2006, 07:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by NIump50
Not sure getting hit in the back is so silly.
99% of the batters are taught to turn inside and take the pitch in the back.
Much better than trying to back out and getting hit in the ribs or the arm.

If I get any movement at all, even a flinch, I give the base. If they stand still on a curve ball, no base, if they were wanting to swing, they would have movement. A batter who stands like a statue and lets a curve ball hit him had no intention of ever swinging and every intention of getting hit. no base!!!!
Perhaps it's just a matter of degree, but I find many of the comments from different people to be saying essentially the same thing with respect to curveballs, and I kind of differ in philosophy. I'm not going to hold a batter to any more stringent standard for reacting to a curveball than any other pitch. Batters have to know how to hit a curveball, and bailing out before it breaks is decidedly NOT a part of that training. Batters should have a right to stay in and ready to hit a curveball, and if it doesn't break enough or at all and hits the batter, as long as he hasn't leaned into it or stuck a chicken wing out there to get hit intentionally, then that's the pitcher's bad, not the hitter's.

I think the NCAA has the right idea with this rule. The strikezone belongs to the pitcher and the batter's box belongs to the batter. If you throw in the batter's box and hit the batter, he should get 1B.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fast pitch - batter "catches" the pitch Dakota Softball 16 Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:06am
Bats: Slow-pitch v. Fast-pitch Blu_IN Softball 3 Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:12pm
Slow Pitch, Fast Pitch, Baseball...they are all the same... Bandit Softball 5 Mon Jun 14, 2004 07:00pm
When does an leegal pitch BECOME and illegal pitch. Illini_Ref Baseball 4 Fri Apr 23, 2004 02:06pm
Legal Pitch vs. Illegal Pitch ? Deion Softball 15 Mon Jun 30, 2003 04:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1