The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 06:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
GD Variation

Considering the other thread that is going on is more about the "point or no point", I thought I'd add a personal take on GD on a new thread.

I was taught the Box originally, but adopted it to something that ended up being GD when I finally found out what GD was. But instead of my hands on my knees, I put them behind my back. I hate the idea of getting foul tips to my fingers. Since I'm young, the fatigue factor doesn't really affect me.

Is this bad?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 07:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
I would say that although the "fatigue" factor isn't a concern for you, your head height throughout a game probably is. Without a decent lockin mechanism you tend to drop your head as you track pitches and lose consistency. I think there are others here that use the GD that know how to help you learn to lockin without leaving your hands completely exposed.



Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 07:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
I was taught many years ago never put your hands behind your back. It makes you look like an amateur.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 07:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
The problem with putting your hands behind your back is that you defeat the real purpose of the GD. That is to get a rock solid lock-in on every pitch, placing your head at the same height each and every pitch. BigUmp is correct, putting your hands behind your back makes it a very good possibility that you might drift up and down with your head.

As to the safety of your hands, I have not ever got hit in the hands using the GD. If you are worried about that, you could slide your hands around the side of your knees, leaving only your thumbs exposed. I have not seen anyone do this, but I assume it works.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.

Last edited by RPatrino; Fri Jun 02, 2006 at 07:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 07:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
I'm not a big fan of putting any weight on your arms. Far too much loaded weight, and no flexibility when hit. But that's just me.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 02, 2006, 08:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt
I'm not a big fan of putting any weight on your arms. Far too much loaded weight, and no flexibility when hit. But that's just me.
Turn your elbows so the fleshy part faces the pitcher, and don't lock the elbows. If a ball hits the arm, the arm will give / bend at the elbow.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 04, 2006, 09:12pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11
Considering the other thread that is going on is more about the "point or no point", I thought I'd add a personal take on GD on a new thread.

I was taught the Box originally, but adopted it to something that ended up being GD when I finally found out what GD was. But instead of my hands on my knees, I put them behind my back. I hate the idea of getting foul tips to my fingers. Since I'm young, the fatigue factor doesn't really affect me.

Is this bad?
If your hands are behing your back you are not working GD, and it you do GD correctly you will not get hit in the fingers. Top of the hand, or wrist maybe, but not fingers. Hands should not be on knees, but on the thigh just above the knee, just above the shin guards. I changed to GD after getting a finger broken on my left hand and have not been hit in the fingers since.

I'm no spring chicken so the fatigue factor is an issue for me, and the GD is a definite plus for mitigating fatigue. But the thing I like the most about it, is it is a rock solid stance to see the pitch with.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 09, 2006, 11:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11
Considering the other thread that is going on is more about the "point or no point", I thought I'd add a personal take on GD on a new thread.

I was taught the Box originally, but adopted it to something that ended up being GD when I finally found out what GD was. But instead of my hands on my knees, I put them behind my back. I hate the idea of getting foul tips to my fingers. Since I'm young, the fatigue factor doesn't really affect me.

Is this bad?
I use the GD stance/system, and rest my hands on my knees. Luckily,
I have never had a "foul tip" hit my hands.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 12:17am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpduck11
I use the GD stance/system, and rest my hands on my knees. Luckily,
I have never had a "foul tip" hit my hands.
I've never had a "foul tip" ever hit me at all in over 20 years of baseball. Anybody else never been hit by a "foul tip?"
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 12:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 477
Send a message via AIM to nickrego
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I've never had a "foul tip" ever hit me at all in over 20 years of baseball. Anybody else never been hit by a "foul tip?"
Yeah, but that was when I was working with my head was too low.

I know better now.
__________________
Have Great Games !

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 01:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I've never had a "foul tip" ever hit me at all in over 20 years of baseball. Anybody else never been hit by a "foul tip?"
Nope, I've never been hit by a foul tip either.......
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 08:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New England, Home of the Brave!
Posts: 312
Send a message via AIM to Rcichon
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I've never had a "foul tip" ever hit me at all in over 20 years of baseball. Anybody else never been hit by a "foul tip?"

Nah me neither. A few foul balls but never a tip.


lol!


Can someone post a decent definition of the GD? Unfamiliar with it.
__________________
Strikes are great.
Outs are better.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Welcome Aboard

I'll leave it to others who definitely know more about the GD system to answer you on this thread.

I'll post the archive / index to this forum's page 1.

http://forum.officiating.com/archive/index.php/f-2.html

From there you can EDIT, FIND {GD topics} very quickly.

Or you can read just about anything of interest.

Have a great time.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 05:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rcichon
Nah me neither. A few foul balls but never a tip.


lol!


Can someone post a decent definition of the GD? Unfamiliar with it.
Carl Childress articles on the Gerry Davis stance - Part I

Carl Childress articles on the Gerry Davis stance - Part II
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 10, 2006, 10:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Stance?

More of a system to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
variation in 3 umpire mechanics ??? SWFLguy Softball 8 Sun May 02, 2004 07:59pm
Situation(variation of rebounding own airball) Jerry Blum Basketball 7 Mon Mar 03, 2003 05:19pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1