The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 03:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
The ball was dead as soon the ejection occurred:

Rule: 5.10(g)
Quote:
The umpire in chief shall call "Time"_(g) When an umpire orders a player or any other person removed from the playing field.
Also, if I remember correctly, the batter/runner was between first and second when the ejection occurred. Thus, he was not legally entitled to second, as he had not touched it, and therefore he remained at first base.

As for the play at home, I thought the plate umpire made the correct call. Even if he didn't, which I believe he did, the catcher had no reason to go off like that.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 04:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
I've read somewhere that the ejection does not occur until after playing action has stopped and it's NOT an automatic time out.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 04:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
Ah yes, 5.10 h and 9.01 d
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 06:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
I've read somewhere that the ejection does not occur until after playing action has stopped and it's NOT an automatic time out.
You got it.
__________________
Throwing people out of a game is like riding a bike- once you get the hang of it, it can be a lot of fun.- Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 07:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 46
It is in the PBUC and Big League manual that the player can continue to play after an ejection till the ball becomes dead. It is not dead at the time of the ejection.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 08:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 33
Send a message via Yahoo to PanamaCityBrian
With runners on first and third and one out, Smoltz hit a tapper in front of the plate against Jose Lima (0-1). Lo Duca fielded the ball with his right hand and lunged back in an attempt to tag Atlanta's Brian McCann. Plate umpire Angel Hernandez called McCann safe, and Lo Duca slammed the ball to the infield grass while arguing.

"I spiked it pretty good, probably better than Ickey Woods, but I didn't do the Ickey Shuffle," Lo Duca said.

Hernandez immediately ejected Lo Duca. Cox got tossed for arguing after Smoltz wasn't allowed to take second.

After the game, both Lima and Lo Duca said that Hernandez told them that he was calling pitches farther off the plate strikes for Smoltz, but not for Lima.

"When the umpire said 'I'm going to give you a couple of inches off the plate, but I'm not going to give you 4-5 inches because you're not John Smoltz,' I'm trying to protect my pitcher," Lo Duca said.



Can someone help me out... I am curious if this sounds alittle funny or these are just too players trying to get a rise out of the umpire ranks with these comments. I just would find it alittle unprofessional to say that to a player after a game like todays.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Oops ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanamaCityBrian
With runners on first and third and one out, Smoltz hit a tapper in front of the plate against Jose Lima (0-1). Lo Duca fielded the ball with his right hand and lunged back in an attempt to tag Atlanta's Brian McCann. Plate umpire Angel Hernandez called McCann safe, and Lo Duca slammed the ball to the infield grass while arguing.

"I spiked it pretty good, probably better than Ickey Woods, but I didn't do the Ickey Shuffle," Lo Duca said.

Hernandez immediately ejected Lo Duca. Cox got tossed for arguing after Smoltz wasn't allowed to take second.

After the game, both Lima and Lo Duca said that Hernandez told them that he was calling pitches farther off the plate strikes for Smoltz, but not for Lima.

"When the umpire said 'I'm going to give you a couple of inches off the plate, but I'm not going to give you 4-5 inches because you're not John Smoltz,' I'm trying to protect my pitcher," Lo Duca said.



Can someone help me out... I am curious if this sounds alittle funny or these are just too players trying to get a rise out of the umpire ranks with these comments. I just would find it alittle unprofessional to say that to a player after a game like todays.

Idiot catcher, doesn't he realize the umpires read the papers also.

And he thinks the strike zone was small for this game ... just wait until the next game.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
That's not atypical from a MLB ump, he's only stating the truth.


Even during the game, the announcers noted (after a close Lima pitch was balled by Hernandez) that if you are wild (as Lima was all day), then its accepted that you won't get as many close strikes as you do when you show control. That's baseball and LoDuca/Lima know that.

This is a attempt to show up Hernandez and you are right, the zone will be a postage stamp next time. But when you are F2 and toss yourself from a game in the 2d inning, what do you expect?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 07, 2006, 11:43pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
LoDuca missed the tag, Smoltz should have been allowed to advance to wherever he had advanced to, since the ball was still alive during the ejection.

It is not surprising that Lima and LoDuca would cry about the strike zone. Who does Lima think he is, Smoltz?

I have long been of the opinion that Angel Hernandez does not belong in the majors.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 08, 2006, 01:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33
SDS, why even go there about Angel. He is a MLB umpire. You have your opinions. Great. What nmakes you qualified. I knwo Angel personally. He has several post season assignments. I am sure he doesn't belong in MLB but they give him those assignments anyways. Well that is incorrect. There are guys that have over ten years in MLB without a psot season assignment. Angel Hernandez is good umpire, by anyones standards. But more importantly, he is a good guy.

As for the play, PU never called time during the play. However, U1 called time when the manager came onto the field. U2 saw that Smoltz hadn't reached 2nd base when time was called. Therefore, Smoltz last legally occupied 1st base. Edn of play.

Cox argues with U2, and U1 must explain what happened. That is why U1 ejects Cox.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mets v. Nationals- HBP and warnings CJN Baseball 4 Fri Apr 07, 2006 05:43pm
Mets-Stros game mattmets Baseball 14 Wed Jun 08, 2005 07:42pm
Mets vs Braves bbump82 Baseball 6 Thu May 26, 2005 10:26am
Cards-Mets, 8/8 - Failure to retouch bigwes68 Baseball 2 Tue Aug 10, 2004 07:49am
Astros-Mets YoungRighty Baseball 9 Mon May 17, 2004 05:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1