|
|||
It's the Scabs fault, It the Scabs fault II
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that one-time stripper and Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith could pursue part of her late husband's oil fortune.
Justices gave new legal life to Smith's bid to collect millions of dollars from the estate of J. Howard Marshall II. Her late husband's estate has been estimated at as much as $1.6 billion. VIDEO: Court rules for Anna Nicole Smith has been embroiled in a long running cross-country court fight with Marshall's youngest son, E. Pierce Marshall. The court's decision means that it will likely not end anytime soon — although there is no guarantee she will collect any money. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the opinion that a Texas court did not have the last word when it ruled against the blonde reality television star. "This is just another battle in a very long war," said Douglas Baird, a bankruptcy expert at the University of Chicago. The ruling gives federal courts more authority to resolve disputes that arise out of estates. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a separate opinion to say that he would have given federal courts more jurisdiction. He said Smith's appeal was "an easy case." Smith was a 26-year-old topless dancer when she married Marshall, then 89, in 1994. He died the following year, setting off an intense family fight. At issue for the justices was competing court jurisdiction. A Texas court held a five-month trial before deciding that Smith was entitled to nothing from Marshall's estate. Smith brought a separate claim in federal court in California. Justices said Monday that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was wrong in ruling that federal courts could not handle Smith's case. Smith, the spokeswoman for a diet products company, had been awarded $474 million by a federal bankruptcy judge. That was later reduced by a federal district judge and then thrown out altogether by the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit. The case now goes back to California. "I will continue to fight to uphold my father's estate plan," Pierce Marshall said Monday. Ginsburg noted that there are several pending issues that could still keep Smith from collecting any money. Before his death Marshall showered Smith with $6.6 million in gifts that included two homes, expensive jewelry and clothes. She contends that he also promised her half his estate. Ginsburg's opinion, and announcement from the bench, included only a hint of the nastiness of the family feud. She said there were accusations that Pierce Marshall "engaged in forgery, fraud, and overreaching to gain control of his father's assets" and, on the other side, that Smith had defamed her former stepson. Pierce Marshall said in a statement that he would "fight to clear my name in California federal court. That is a promise that (Smith) and her lawyers can take to the bank." Smith's case had brought unusual drama to the normally sedate high court. Dressed in all black, she wept in the courtroom in late February as justices discussed Marshall and whether he had intended to provide for his young wife in death. When Smith arrived at the court, several photographers were knocked to the ground in a scuffle to take her picture. The case is Marshall v. Marshall, 04-1544. |
|
|||
I believe that would be another case of getting what you signed up for.
In other news: Quote:
Wasn't there just a story from the AMLU that said how the AMLU umpires were well prepared for the strike? Apparently almost all have other jobs that pay them more than what they make umpiring. How much did they want for a five month job?
__________________
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. ~Naguib Mahfouz |
|
|||
Now you guys are just getting out of hand.
Keep on keepin' on. I wish I was as much in tune with the brotherhood and support giving to these guys as you all seem to be. You guys will be the first ones calling the locker room in your minor league town asking for tickets or to go have a drink with these guys as well, I bet. Good luck. |
|
|||
I enjoy a touch of gambling...I'll take your bet.
What was so touchy about that post?
__________________
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. ~Naguib Mahfouz |
|
|||
I just think now you guys are blaming everything on the scabs in an effort to be cute and really try to stick it to people, such as myself, who feel that Adam Dowdy's name and the word scab should be nowhere within a three block radius.
|
|
|||
I don't think you know anything about me then.
As for the person starting the thread, I can only assume that he is trying to get a rise out of people who strike at any bait thrown in the water. The title will draw views. Relax...logical people know that Dowdy earned his spot and that The Boss is just blowing off steam. You don't get there without being competent (unless your last name is Wendlestedt).
__________________
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. ~Naguib Mahfouz |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
I'm sorry it took so long for you to notice that I have no compunction about challenging anyone.
Life is far too short to remain quiet...just ask Marcel Marceau (wait, you can't!).
__________________
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. ~Naguib Mahfouz |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's the SCABS fault, It's the SCABS fault | your boss | Baseball | 27 | Mon May 08, 2006 12:00am |
Bad fundamentals coaches fault, refs fault, both? | bekays | Basketball | 15 | Sun Feb 19, 2006 05:50pm |
Is it always our fault? | Luv4Asian8 | Basketball | 18 | Mon Sep 22, 2003 04:15pm |
Eval'd --- oops ... wind's fault !!! | bobbrix | Softball | 24 | Mon Sep 01, 2003 06:56pm |