Tue Dec 06, 2005, 05:59pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
When it was stated that his left foot was on the line, I took it to mean the foul line. This would place his right foot inside the running lane. Since the lines are part of the lane, he is inside the running lane, and the answer is D. If, however, he meant that the left foot was on the outside line defining the lane, then he is not in the lane, making the answer A.
I think he meant the foul line, but I've been wrong before (duh!)
Edited to switch A and D. (typo)
[Edited by SanDiegoSteve on Dec 6th, 2005 at 03:58 PM]
|
You first said, "If the BR's feet are both outside the running lane, the answer would be A."
The point is that *both* feet don't need to be outside the lane -- if even one foot is outside the lane, then the runner is outside the lane a liable to be called for interference.
|
You are right. I knew that, but again I engaged the keyboard prior to the brain.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
|
Threaded Mode
