Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
Now knowing that the the information posted by Mike Walsh was incorrect and the B/R was not out of the running lane, do you wish to reload and take another shot?
|
Sure.
Post the exact article and let's try this again.
|
It's on the paid side. Several have posted that the play was that the runner was on the line. I'd suggest that you accept that.
|
If the article cannot be posted, because it is on the paid side, then I certainly respect that copyright. However, I'm not interested in playing "he said, she said" either.
I commented as to Mike Walsh' original post.
'Nuff said.
By the way, are you one of the "others"? [/B][/QUOTE]
I know your original response was to Mike's post.
My response to you was, however to the post where you said:
Post the exact article and let's try this again.
Luke, Garth and I all posted that we know that the original was "on the line".
Even if we did cut and paste, how would you know we didn't alter it in the process?
If you think we're all stretching the truth, the only alternative is to go and read it on the paid side.