The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 06, 2005, 12:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
This doesn't sound like an intentional act. What justification do you have for calling BR out also?
Intent is never an issue in the case of interference or obstruction. Makes no difference in how the prescribed penalty is applied. [/QUOTE]

Not true.

[Edited by GarthB on Jul 6th, 2005 at 01:30 PM]
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 06, 2005, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
Intent is never an issue in the case of interference or obstruction. Makes no difference in how the prescribed penalty is applied.
That's not true.Don't say never. It is not part of this sitch, but the intent of a runner that intentionally interfers on a double play has an effect (both runner and BR are out) and the intent of a runner that is in contact with a base that intentionally interfers has an effect (both runner and BR are out).

Intent can effect the penalty (situation dependent).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1