![]() |
|
|
|||
jicecone,
Saying you have to see "the move" is a cop out. "The move" - disengaging the rubber by lifting the leg, "straight up, knee to chest almost" is clear to everyone. There is no debate that I am aware of about what the move is. I don't believe anyone said that making "the move" was "the begining or simulation of a pitch". What was said is that "the motion" is associated with a pitch (or step to a base). Motion is the keyword in the rule. Is the motion the same no matter which leg you do it with? Answer - Yes. That is all that is required to make the move illegal. Is there any other legitimate reason to bring the leg and knee up that high, except to pitch or throw to a base? Answer - No. Is "the move" a backward off motion? Answer - No. "The move" is clearly up/off first without moving backward. The term "backward off" is written together in the rule. There are no joining words like "and" (backward and off) or "then" (backward then off). Is there a reason to allow two separate and distinct movements when the two motions are written together without any joining words? Answer - No. Mr. Evan's reasoning and interpretation support the arguments made above. Before you start referring to people as stupid, I would look in the mirror first. Quote:
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|