The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 09:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
Anybody see the Oklahoma/Oklahoma St. game on ESPN yesterday? Appears THEY called a balk to second. I thought from the chatter here that calling a balk to second was a near impossibility.

Apparently, according to the announcers, the pitchers entire foot did not "clear the rubber" on his spin to second, thus the balk, although from the angles show on the replays, his foot planted behind the rubber on his spin to second (maybe not the tip of his heal???).

Any comments on the call?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Nobody has claimed that a pitcher can't balk while making a move to second. Only that the balk is technically for something else -- perhaps stepping toward first in your example (I didn't see the play).
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 09:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
There is a post about halfway down this page with 3 pages of people discussing balks to second. This pitcher clearly had his foot toward second base, but the heal was still on the edge of the back part of the rubber.

Unless I'm mistaken both Tim and Garth were supporting a "no balk to second" philosophy. I probably should go back and re-read.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by blueump
Anybody see the Oklahoma/Oklahoma St. game on ESPN yesterday? Appears THEY called a balk to second. I thought from the chatter here that calling a balk to second was a near impossibility.

Apparently, according to the announcers, the pitchers entire foot did not "clear the rubber" on his spin to second, thus the balk, although from the angles show on the replays, his foot planted behind the rubber on his spin to second (maybe not the tip of his heal???).

Any comments on the call?
1. The position that Tim and I and several others have taken is that it is impossible, at least 99% of the time to balk to second base. One can commit a balk while attempting a pick off at second, but nearly always that balk is technically for a different reason.

2. You listened to announcers explain a balk? My Gawd.

3. Yes, you should re-read the thread.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Wink

Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB

1. The position that Tim and I and several others have taken is that it is impossible, at least 99% of the time to balk to second base. One can commit a balk while attempting a pick off at second, but nearly always that balk is technically for a different reason.

[/B]
GB,

While your statement certainly reflects my position on the question, I believe that in order to reflect Tim's position you would need to "add" 1% to your first sentence and "subtract" a "nearly" from the second.

JM
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
And,

I do not feel that I can comment on the "TV" balk as I did not see it nor is there an explanation of it in the game summary.

Since I cannot comment on the balk I could not say if the umpires were correct in what they called.

And having seen the first three innings only I have no idea of the quality of those umpires.

EDIT:

So now I am receiving more information about this crew.

It appears on a Batter's Interference they returned a stealing R1 to first after calling BI but called no one out?

Again, I did not see the play so I cannot comment on the crew quality. Or if this play happened as reported to me.



[Edited by Tim C on May 16th, 2005 at 12:23 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by CoachJM
Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB

1. The position that Tim and I and several others have taken is that it is impossible, at least 99% of the time to balk to second base. One can commit a balk while attempting a pick off at second, but nearly always that balk is technically for a different reason.
GB,

While your statement certainly reflects my position on the question, I believe that in order to reflect Tim's position you would need to "add" 1% to your first sentence and "subtract" a "nearly" from the second.

JM [/B]
The you would be wrong.

While Tim, I believe, invented IIITBTSB, in many threads he has also discussed not only the semantics issue and factual probabilities versus the practical world. In the non-TWP practical world, IISTBTSB. Tim and I are in complete agreement on that. If he were not so tired of this subject coming up again and again and people trying to invent balks to second that are either not balks or just do happen in the world that has a blue sky, he would let you know himself.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 03:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Re: And,

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
It appears on a Batter's Interference they returned a stealing R1 to first after calling BI but called no one out?

Again, I did not see the play so I cannot comment on the crew quality. Or if this play happened as reported to me.
Tee, I saw this last night, and I was wondering what they ruled. R1 was stealing second, and the batter moved in front of the catcher without touching him. F2 never threw the ball, or never brought the ball up like he was going to throw. R1 was sent back to first, and the batter was not called out. I could not figure out what the ruling was. I reviewed the NCAA book and that didn't help at all. Am I missing something?

Also, in the next half inning, I thought U3 missed a clear FPSR violation. F4 was touching the third base side of 2nd base, with his other foot also on the third base side of the base (his entire body was in the "fielder protected zone"). R1 slides into F4 and knockes him over. R1 never touches second base except with his right hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1