|
|||
Runners on 1st & 2nd, I am PU, Bu is in C Slot.
B1 checks his swing & I ask my partner for Help "did he go"? I caught him off guard & he did not react right away then gave the safe sign.Was I wrong for asking for his help with a right hand batter up? What if it was a lefty up? 2- I understand the V in a 2 man crew, but with none on & f8 makes a great catch in center who's call would it be? 3- Do you (PU) signal verbally when a infielder makes a catch at his shoe tops? Thanks, Robert |
|
|||
Quote:
1 and 2: These are pregame things that you need to go over. According to the mechanics, you can ask your partner on any check swing. But remember at the NF level, it is up to you and only you to make that decision. In college you ask if the catcher requests appeal. #2: If the centerfielder goes to his right, most of the time it is your call as the PU. But again, you need to discuss this and see what your partner does too. If he goes out, you assist in a call if needed, but you have the runners primarily. #3: I personally verbally every out. You do not have to do it very loud, but you do it so that someone knows that you at least had an out. Just my opinion.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
2- Should be PU's call unless special circumstances discussed earlier perhaps fog or poor ligjting etc. In that case BU has to say "I'm on the ball" and PU has BR into second. 3- All outs should be signalled either verbally or with hand signal. Obvious outs call for a more subdued reaction. Jim Simms /NYC |
|
|||
I agree, Tim C. I always tell my partner "If I come to you, tell me what you've got - don't just agree with me because of where you are". Of course, it does lead to an occasional word or two when the PU comes to me with nobody on base and a lefty up, and I ring a strike - but it's my judgement and my responsibility to give him what I've got if he comes to me.
|
|
|||
Completely disagree.
Quote:
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
I'm also with Tee on this one. A BU in any position needs to be allowed to make the call. No matter where he is, a BU should say "Yes, he went!" if and only if he is 100% sure that the batter went. On a right handed batter, the BU in C is going to be 100% sure less often than the BU in A. The calls will reflect this, and all participants will get what they want.
And yes, it is good to cover these things when talking with your partner before the game. P-Sz |
|
|||
Well this debate has raged forever on every board.
While Tee sticks to his ask and yee shall recieve, I will stick to my assertions that in B or C, there is NO WAY, NO WAY, NO WAY, that the base umpire has a better view than the plate umpire. I will ask, but it better be VERY APPARENT (LIKE HE TOTALLY SWUNG WHILE I FELL DOWN). Every time I see this, I see an arguement begins. I just think it is poor game management to have the base umpire in this position "overrule" the plate umpire. Unless the plate umpire had a brain fart or fell down, call safe, it is what most are expecting anyway. Tee and I will forever disagree on this one. Blaine |
|
|||
Re: Completely disagree.
Quote:
I have a Minor League manual from the days of Umpire Development Program that requires in a three-man system that the PU check with the "proper BU". Thus with a lefty that would be the third base umpire in "D" not the umpire in "A" or "B". So it may be a "myth" or an old wives tail that it is foolish for coaches to ask for a check of LHB in "A". However, I think it is still a fairly prevalent belief. Thus you may be questioned if you treat it as "just the same". In both OBR and FED I do appeal as PU even with a LHB. I agree in FED you should generally treat it the same as OBR. As PU I go to my partner must slower. As BU I generally mention to the coach or players that absent mirrors or video replay I don't have much help that I can add. I have never had the retort that it is the same appeal. They seem to understand. These types of appeals should be in moderation. PU should not let coaches appeal every inning otherwise you're not in control. |
|
|||
PU does not always....
have the best angle. Sometimes a batter might go after a bad pitch. And when that happens the catcher might get in your way. That is when a PU might need to ask for an appeal. Especially at the lower levels (NF and below) because the catcher might be in your way to get a clear look.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
As for the other issues raised with respect to who has the best view, among other things, I refer you to my 3-Part series at eUmpire.com entitled "Help on a Half Swing". If you have subscribed you may view it by checking the baseball archive. I'm sure you would find it helpful and very instructive on such matters. Quote:
Quote:
There are two purposes for making such a vociferous call. One is to give all the runners, including the batter-runner, the earliest possible opportunity to either continue or stop advancing hard, and/or return to their bases when no longer forced, and so prevent unnecessary injuries running the bases when the out has already been made or transforming easy returns into close tag plays. The second reason is to give your partner advice that another out has been made or not, and so allow him to decide whether to continue running, or return to his position, etc. Cheers, |
|
|||
Ouch!
Quote:
I don't think Blaine was advocating umpires take the "easy way out" on the "too tough" call. I think all he was saying was that, unless blocked, PU has the better view of this play DESPITE what the defense might think when they make their appeal. You know how I feel about base umpires overruling the plate umpire when the plate umpire has made a deliberate decision on the half swing, so we won't continue that debate here. Either way, I don't see any justification for disparaging Blaine's abilities as an official on the strength of this one issue, do you? Perhaps you were only joking and omitted the obligatory "smilies", eh? Cheers, |
|
|||
Re: Completely disagree.
Quote:
While I respect your views on this, I do think you may have mis-read Mr Simm's post. He didn't say he wouldn't check when asked. He said he wouldn't check with BU in C UNLESS he was appealed to, presumably by the catcher or manager. In other words, he wouldn't go to BU in C on a half swing on his own volition without an appeal. Cheers, |
|
|||
Re: Re: Completely disagree.
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|