|
Fri Apr 01, 2005, 02:24pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The correct answer is "false." If F2 retires the runner, that out stands so there is no need to automatically declare the runner out (the catcher got him despite the interference). If F2 does not retire the runner due to the BR interference, you would then declare the runner out for the BR's action. But the out call is not "automatic." Another FED test question that deals more with the wording than the essence of the rule.
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
