The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 06, 2005, 08:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 20
Hi folks..FED Rules....Can someone please tell me at what point do you enforce the penalties for an illegal glove worn by a pitcher. We are now told that additional colored glove requirements are to be enforced. (red white blue, black and brown and of course white and gray)
Is it when he toes the rubber or does he have to pitch the ball or is it only being involved in a play, either by fielding or receiving a ball? I have told a lot of our officials that I am using preventative umpiring and making coaches aware of the new glove requirements for the pitcher at the home plate meeting hoping that heads off potential problems.
Thanks
Bake17
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 06, 2005, 11:02pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally posted by bake17
Hi folks..FED Rules....Can someone please tell me at what point do you enforce the penalties for an illegal glove worn by a pitcher. We are now told that additional colored glove requirements are to be enforced. (red white blue, black and brown and of course white and gray)
Is it when he toes the rubber or does he have to pitch the ball or is it only being involved in a play, either by fielding or receiving a ball? I have told a lot of our officials that I am using preventative umpiring and making coaches aware of the new glove requirements for the pitcher at the home plate meeting hoping that heads off potential problems.
Thanks
Bake17
I have never seen a pitcher go to the mound with a red, white and blue glove, but if I did I would ask him to change before he started warmups. I have never had a complaint about pitcher's glove color so I would ignore black and brown unless the other team complained.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 06, 2005, 11:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sheffield Lake, Ohio
Posts: 340
Nothing in the NFHS book stipulates " when " you make the call that the glove is illegal. I would check it out as soon as I spotted it - during warm-up pitches, warming up before the game, etc. and if it is IYO illegal, I would ask him to change it immediately.
__________________
Tony Smerk
OHSAA Certified
Class 1 Official
Sheffield Lake, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 01:10am
Michael Taylor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you want to be preventive then just get rid of it when he starts to warmup, but leave it out of your pregame. As a matter of fact leave as much as you can out of your pregame. Get everyone introduced, exchange lineups, discuss groundrules, and ask if the teams are properly equiped. Leave all the junk out, it serves no purpose except possibly putting you on the wrong foot with a manager.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 07:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
NFHS Rule Book: 6-2-1 (f) states " Illegal acts include: wearing any items on the hands, wrists or arms that may be distracting for the batter." While he's taking his first warm ups, I'll be looking for any of the above.

6-2-1 (h) "wearing a glove/mitt that is white, gray or multi-colored." Our state interpreter informed us that two shades of the same color (as pictured on the covers of the Rule Book/Case Book)is not in violation of the above rule.

IMHO, preventative officiating should be used, address it as soon as you see it.

IG3
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 07:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally posted by IveGot3rd
NFHS Rule Book: 6-2-1 (f) states " Illegal acts include: wearing any items on the hands, wrists or arms that may be distracting for the batter." While he's taking his first warm ups, I'll be looking for any of the above.

6-2-1 (h) "wearing a glove/mitt that is white, gray or multi-colored." Our state interpreter informed us that two shades of the same color (as pictured on the covers of the Rule Book/Case Book)is not in violation of the above rule.

IMHO, preventative officiating should be used, address it as soon as you see it.

IG3
You did'nt quote 6-2-1h completely. The last part says "that may be distracting to the batter." Not the umpire. I would wait to it is brought up and then address it.

I believe I had to address this once in 20 years. IMO it is one of those "don't pick boogers" items. Unless, it is a total local enforcement type of thing. I guess that is their perogative though.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 08:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,138
Quote:
Originally posted by jicecone
You did'nt quote 6-2-1h completely. The last part says "that may be distracting to the batter." Not the umpire. I would wait to it is brought up and then address it.

No, it doesn't.

IMHO, you're better off addressing this as soon as you see it. Otherwise, some manager is going to wait until F1 fields a ground ball, and then complain. If you now agree the glove is illegal, you'll have to enforce the penalty for touching a batted ball with an illegal glove (3 bases). (See the FED interps of last year and the year before.)

(The above assumes, of course, that you agree that the glove is illegal -- multi-colored, for example. If you've decided that the glove is just two shades of the same color -- dark brown and tan, for example, then just tell the coach that when he complains.)

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 04:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by jicecone
You did'nt quote 6-2-1h completely. The last part says "that may be distracting to the batter." Not the umpire. I would wait to it is brought up and then address it.

No, it doesn't.

IMHO, you're better off addressing this as soon as you see it. Otherwise, some manager is going to wait until F1 fields a ground ball, and then complain. If you now agree the glove is illegal, you'll have to enforce the penalty for touching a batted ball with an illegal glove (3 bases). (See the FED interps of last year and the year before.)

(The above assumes, of course, that you agree that the glove is illegal -- multi-colored, for example. If you've decided that the glove is just two shades of the same color -- dark brown and tan, for example, then just tell the coach that when he complains.)

Bad morning when I answered this and the day did'nt get any better.

I agree Bob. As Rosanna Danna use to say, "NEVER MIND".
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 07, 2005, 10:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
JI,I believe it was actually Emily Latella who
used that line,lol.......(although they were both
played by the same actress,Gilda Radner).

[Edited by umpduck11 on Mar 7th, 2005 at 10:20 PM]
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 08, 2005, 08:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
As I said , it was a bad day .
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 08, 2005, 04:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 335
speaking of illegal gloves, does FED rules state that a fielder (except 1B) cannot wear a firstbasemen's mitt? If so, please state the rule. According to 1-3-6 the only exception is for the catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 08, 2005, 04:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,138
Quote:
Originally posted by scyguy
speaking of illegal gloves, does FED rules state that a fielder (except 1B) cannot wear a firstbasemen's mitt? If so, please state the rule. According to 1-3-6 the only exception is for the catcher.
No. In fact, just the opposite. Any fielder may wear any type of glove / mitt as long as it meets the size requirements.

See 1.3.7B and 1.3.7C
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 08, 2005, 04:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 335
Bob, looking at the 05 Fed book, I only see 1-3 going up to Art.6 the last citation is 1-3-6c on the bottom of page 13. Top of 14 starts with 1-4-1. Anyway, thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 08, 2005, 05:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
1-3 is in the rule book. 1.3 is in the casebook.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1