Accidental appeal and mechanics question.

[Tim C]

Let me get this straight:

If Evans says one thing, and Roder says another who trumps whom?

Not a very tough call:

Roder once published that a pitch that bounces BEFORE a batter swings and tips it, that the ball COULD NOT BE CAUGHT for a foul tip.

Pretty strange. If the same pitch could be hit for a home run why not a foul tip.

Evans set him straight.

While neither Evans not Roder are official in their interpretations I think it is pretty obvious that Evans's work carries much more weight.

Let's thank a FED missprint for this entire thread.