|
Thu Sep 02, 2004, 03:16pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is it legal under any set of rules, when in the stretch to step off the rubber in front (towards the batter) with the pivot foot and throw to any base? Or does it have to be behind the rubber?
|
|
Thu Sep 02, 2004, 03:34pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
OBR - Rule 8
NFHS - Rule 6
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
|
|
Thu Sep 02, 2004, 04:22pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Fri Sep 03, 2004, 09:45am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Orioles35,
When the move to first let's say(RHP) is a jump or jab type, and continuous, it is possible to have the pivot foot come off the rubber and quickly plant forward of the rubber. This is considered legal if that is what your reference is relating to. Joe
|
|
Fri Sep 03, 2004, 12:37pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Refer to the PBUC Umpire Manual, 6.4 Special Balk Regulations, paragraph(i): "It is legal for a right-handed pitcher to begin a pick-off move to first base by first moving his pivot foot in the dirction of third base provided that he makes a legal step toward first base with his non-pivot foot before throwing there and provided that the move is continuous and without interruption. A pitcher who makes such a pick-off move is considered to be in contact with the rubber when he makes his throw to first base."
|
|
Sun Sep 05, 2004, 10:36am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
1. The base to which the ball is thrown must be occupied by a runner -or- it is a base to which a runner is clearly advancing. 2. The free foot must gain distance and direction towards the base. The accepted interpretation of "direction" is a 90-degree cone, oriented toward that base, defined by two 45-degree lines. 3. The move must be continuous, without hesitation or alteration of direction. If there is complete compliance with the above 3 items, it really doesn't matter where the pivot foot ends up. The pitcher can not step off forward of the rubber then execute the pickoff maneuver. That would violate point #3 above - it would not be continuous since stepping off forward of the rubber is not considered a legal disengagement. Once a pitcher has stepped off backwards (a legal disengagement), the pitcher no longer has to comply with any of the above points. A RHP's move toward 1st base almost always involves his pivot foot landing somewhere in front of the rubber. That is perfectly legal as long as it goes in front of the rubber as part of a continuous motion ... and there is compliance with the other two points above. There are jump/spin moves toward 2nd that frequently involve the pivot foot landing in front of the rubber. Perfectly legal. David Emerling Memphis, TN
|
|
Tue Sep 07, 2004, 11:47am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Had a fun one Sunday afternoon. Two teams who went through a balk-fest in a prior game, one of which who had a pitcher who stepped off the rubber TOWARDS home plate, exactly what this thread was about.
We were warned before-hand about the prior game, the coaches. During pregame, everything was made clear between PU and myself. We agreed we would 'balk early and often', to take control of the game right at the start. We called one "no stop" balk on each team (these are 11 year olds) and didn't hear a peep about anything for the rest of the game. In fact, the game went very quickly because it seemed both teams were afraid to throw over to first for fear of balking again!
|
|
Wed Sep 08, 2004, 03:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What he can't do is ... step off in front of the rubber ... and then execute a pickoff maneuver. If that's what the pitchers in your game were doing, that would be a balk. David Emerling Memphis, TN
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
