Mon Jan 15, 2001, 07:48pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 508
|
|
Jaska-who?????
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick Szalapski
Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
(Half) Inning ended with 3rd out. The only thing to recognize is appeal(s) if made. Ball remains live as it must for any potential appeal to occur. Act of runner returning to touch missed base means nothing after inning has ended (as any runner touching home after 3rd out means nothing). Sounds like runner should have either touched home initially or returned to touch it prior to 3rd out occurring. I see no major question here.
Just my opinion,
|
Again, non-appeal fourth outs may also occur after the third out--do you disagree with the Jaksa-Roder interpretation? However, you may be right about the fact that runners may not correct baserunning mistakes when three are out. I'm still not sure why, though, other than it would make it a lot simpler.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
J/R is NOT authorotative literature. I have seen some of thier interps directly in conflict with NAPBL, on the info provided on these boards. I do not own J/R, but have NAPBL. 3 friends of mine who work proball have never even heard of J/R. I'm gonna find out tonite, we start our fed meetings, on this play. It is quite interesting.....
P-Sz
|
|
Threaded Mode
