The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 01, 2004, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 477
Send a message via AIM to nickrego
This is the closest thing I could find which addresses this;

OBR 8.01(a): The Windup Position... he may take one step backward, and one step forward with his free foot.

As long as he delivers the pitch to the plate, I think I would not balk it. There really is nothing that says during that step forward, his pivot foot can not lose contact with the rubber. And it is not even mentioned for the Set Position.

I was able to reproduce this action quite easily. Just push off the rubber with a little hop and you get it. The pitcher probably thinks he is getting another couple of MPH on his pitches not realizing that once you lose contact with the rubber, you lose the power of your legs and hips. It is actually a disadvantage for the pitcher because he loses his stabilizing point. My guess is this kid does not get the velocity he could and probably does not hit his spots.

But I don't see how he is gaining an advantage on the runners or deceiving them in any way ? I suggest he gets a new pitching coach also.

__________________
Have Great Games !

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2004, 12:38am
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally posted by nickrego
This is the closest thing I could find which addresses this;

OBR 8.01(a): The Windup Position... he may take one step backward, and one step forward with his free foot.

As long as he delivers the pitch to the plate, I think I would not balk it. There really is nothing that says during that step forward, his pivot foot can not lose contact with the rubber. And it is not even mentioned for the Set Position.

I was able to reproduce this action quite easily. Just push off the rubber with a little hop and you get it. The pitcher probably thinks he is getting another couple of MPH on his pitches not realizing that once you lose contact with the rubber, you lose the power of your legs and hips. It is actually a disadvantage for the pitcher because he loses his stabilizing point. My guess is this kid does not get the velocity he could and probably does not hit his spots.

But I don't see how he is gaining an advantage on the runners or deceiving them in any way ? I suggest he gets a new pitching coach also.

Whether a balk or not was not the question. And being able to reproduce it means nothing. It just means you would be called for illegal pitch also. He is getting closer to the plate before releasing the pitch, which is an advantage. If you don't stop this he will hop scotch to the grass in front of the mound.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2004, 07:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Maybe not

Quote:
Originally posted by DG
Quote:
Originally posted by nickrego
This is the closest thing I could find which addresses this;

OBR 8.01(a): The Windup Position... he may take one step backward, and one step forward with his free foot.

As long as he delivers the pitch to the plate, I think I would not balk it. There really is nothing that says during that step forward, his pivot foot can not lose contact with the rubber. And it is not even mentioned for the Set Position.

I was able to reproduce this action quite easily. Just push off the rubber with a little hop and you get it. The pitcher probably thinks he is getting another couple of MPH on his pitches not realizing that once you lose contact with the rubber, you lose the power of your legs and hips. It is actually a disadvantage for the pitcher because he loses his stabilizing point. My guess is this kid does not get the velocity he could and probably does not hit his spots.

But I don't see how he is gaining an advantage on the runners or deceiving them in any way ? I suggest he gets a new pitching coach also.

Whether a balk or not was not the question. And being able to reproduce it means nothing. It just means you would be called for illegal pitch also. He is getting closer to the plate before releasing the pitch, which is an advantage. If you don't stop this he will hop scotch to the grass in front of the mound.
We have one kid (going to local college) who did this move, and he was very precise with his control which surprised me.

I did notice though late in the season he had seemed to lose some velocity. Maybe because of his unusual mechanics.

But I asked him about it once, and he said he was taught that at a pitching camp - go figure.

Hey he threw upper 80's and threw strikes, my kind of pitcher.

thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2004, 07:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally posted by akalsey
I can't see how that could be a legal pitch.

Quote:
Originally posted by Dave Hensley
In the picture you linked to, the pitcher's pivot foot appears to be in the hole in front of the rubber...
I think you may be looking at the wrong picture. There were two posted. The first is the really odd looking one...

http://users.adelphia.net/~mmyers2/picture.jpg
As Garth said and I agree now that I'm seeing the correct picture, he's off pretty far and pretty soon in his delivery, compared to the phenomenon I was describing that applies to most pitchers. This is, indeed, an extreme motion, but I still don't know what I'd do about it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1