|
Fri Jun 11, 2004, 01:51pm
|
|||
|
|||
As I stated I shoud have put FED RULES after my statement but I did not . I am fairly certain I know the FED rule . I don't think it was neccessary for the gentleman to come back with such a negative response for an error of omission. A simple response to correct my error would have been received with a "Thanks , my apologies" and we would have moved on .
You guys are a little too much for me... 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
