Intent of the Rule

[Bfair]

I glanced briefly over all posts reading none in great detail.

What I noticed was many looking at too much detail of original situation rather than looking at what is really addressed by both Pete Booth's original post and Carl's original article. This thread deals with philosophy, not individual situations you can develop. Your success will depend upon how well you can understand the philosophy and employ it in your game.

What is being acknowledged is: we either do overlook or should agree that certain technical infractions are overlooked based on the caliber of game and the significance of the infraction. The non-enforcement is not in accordance with the rules, but is, indeed, in accordance with the intent of the rule. Additionally, this is rightfully done for the sake of the contest at hand.

First, we are proper in acknowleding its existence. Denial will lead nowhere. Second, we know this could lead to inconsistency in officiating from one contest to another.

I contend that the success and progress of an umpire will be affected significantly by these decisions that are not taught or referenced in a rulebook. We all need to realize that. You must develop or mimic a sytem that, with common sense, leads to the consistency sought among officials for the level you call.

I agree with Pete's original post but also add there are times that despite the lack of apparent intent, infractions must be called. These instances occur when (1) advantage is gained for whatever reason, and (2) the infraction is so obvious to all that it is impossible for the official to overlook it.

Please note this philosophy differs significantly vs. just not having the guts to make the right, controversial call when it should be made. (an officiating flaw which, at times, some will attempt to justify thru this philosophy)

From your post, Pete, I would be proud to officiate with you. Carl, I commend you for publicly addressing an issue so vital to the proper performance of our responsibilities (which is to attempt to maintain fairness in the contest). Highlighting and discussing its existence is a major step forward, and this is an excellent place to discuss such issues.

Just my opinion,