The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 19, 2004, 12:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 72
I am trying to get up to speed on the rule changes for FED this year. In the sections for substitutions the new rule states that the penalty for an illegal substitute is confining to the dugout for the remainder of the game. Then the next sentence seems to indicate that if an illegal substitute is detected by the team on offense, the substitute is to be ejected from the game. Did FED just forget to edit this or am I missing something? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 19, 2004, 12:43pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,527
Question Please clarify.

Could you show the specific passage you are refering to? I am not seeing what you are talking about specifically. I might be looking in the wrong section?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 19, 2004, 12:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 72
Found the answer. Rule 3-1-1.

http://www.cifccs.org/playoffs/Playi...%20changes.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 19, 2004, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally posted by Jake80
I am trying to get up to speed on the rule changes for FED this year. In the sections for substitutions the new rule states that the penalty for an illegal substitute is confining to the dugout for the remainder of the game. Then the next sentence seems to indicate that if an illegal substitute is detected by the team on offense, the substitute is to be ejected from the game. Did FED just forget to edit this or am I missing something? Thanks
FED forgot to edit the second sentence. It should contain the phrase "restricted to the dugout."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2004, 07:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
The point to the restricted to the dugout on this is the coach is responsible for the kids until game over or back to school on a roadie. This allows the player to remain in the dugout where the coach can keep an eye on him.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2004, 07:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1
The point to the restricted to the dugout on this is the coach is responsible for the kids until game over or back to school on a roadie. This allows the player to remain in the dugout where the coach can keep an eye on him.
Not true. Even an ejected player (not a coach) is sent to the dugout.

The point is that, in some states, an Ejected player is automatically suspended for the next game. The rules committee felt this was too big of a penalty for this infraction, so they changed the penalty to restricted to the dugout. No Ejection -- no suspension.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1