The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 13, 2016, 08:24am
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Break out the casebooks

Situation from last night's game:

top of the 5th, no outs, no runners on. I'm BU.

Last batter of the previous inning was Zed.

batting order for the inning is supposed to be:
Abel
Baker
Charlie
Don (DH-ing for Erik)
Freddy

Abel bats and hits a single. So far, so good.

Then
1) The coach for the visitors attempts to substitute Don for Baker, and put Erik in Don's spot in the order. Luckily the PU was on top of things and didn't allow it.

2) The home coach comes out and appeals that Abel was batting out of order, and that Zed was supposed to be the first batter of the inning. The appeal was denied... Abel was the proper batter.

Got me thinking... I know we got it right, but what would've happened if #1 hadn't been discovered until after a) Don stepped into the batter's box b) after Don had completed his turn at bat but before the timeline for a legal appeal was over, or c) after don completed his turn at bad and the timeline for a legal appeal had passed?

(and yes, I know the answers to my questions... I'm posing it for discussion and as a teaching point for the lurking newbies)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
Situation from last night's game:

top of the 5th, no outs, no runners on. I'm BU.

Last batter of the previous inning was Zed.

batting order for the inning is supposed to be:
Abel
Baker
Charlie
Don (DH-ing for Erik)
Freddy

Abel bats and hits a single. So far, so good.

Then
1) The coach for the visitors attempts to substitute Don for Baker, and put Erik in Don's spot in the order. Luckily the PU was on top of things and didn't allow it.

2) The home coach comes out and appeals that Abel was batting out of order, and that Zed was supposed to be the first batter of the inning. The appeal was denied... Abel was the proper batter.

Got me thinking... I know we got it right, but what would've happened if #1 hadn't been discovered until after a) Don stepped into the batter's box b) after Don had completed his turn at bat but before the timeline for a legal appeal was over, or c) after don completed his turn at bad and the timeline for a legal appeal had passed?

(and yes, I know the answers to my questions... I'm posing it for discussion and as a teaching point for the lurking newbies)
If the substitution was announced and allowed and the defense then questioned it Don would be called out and restricted to the bench.
If the substitution was unannounced then most likely the defense would protest batting out of order. When the offense then tries to clear up the issue and tells you that that was a substitution you would have to treat it as an illegal substitution.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Break'in The Law Man In Blue Basketball 6 Wed Feb 04, 2009 07:14pm
Taking a break scottk_61 Softball 5 Mon May 07, 2007 07:59pm
Ready for the Break? refnrev Basketball 10 Tue Jan 02, 2007 01:54am
Casebooks Rookie Basketball 7 Wed Dec 20, 2000 09:47pm
Coach "gives me a break"! Mark Padgett Basketball 8 Mon May 08, 2000 12:28am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1