The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Last Time By Question

NFHS Question. Can anyone please explain the logic with regards to last-time-by not being applicable in casebook 8.2.6 SITUATION H: R1 is stealing on the pitch and a fly ball is hit to right field. R1 misses second base by (a) a few inches or (b) a greater distance because he cuts across the infield missing second base as he advanced toward third base. F9 catches the fly ball and R1 now retouches second base as he retreats to first base. F9’s throw is errant and R1 reaches first base ahead of the throw. The defense now appeals that R1 should be out as he did not initially touch second base. RULING: In (a), R1 is not declared out as he touched second on his last time by the base. In (b), R1 is out on appeal because a runner who misses a base by such a great distance in order to gain an advantage would still be vulnerable to appeal under the principle of last time by.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
If you miss a base by "accident" you are allowed to correct it on last-time-by.

If you cheat, you can't take advantage of this rule.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:38am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
If you miss a base by "accident" you are allowed to correct it on last-time-by.

If you cheat, you can't take advantage of this rule.
Which makes no sense.

R1 has to take the same path (and the same amount of time) to retreat to second and then first in both situations. It shouldn't matter HOW he got to third.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
Which makes no sense.

R1 has to take the same path (and the same amount of time) to retreat to second and then first in both situations. It shouldn't matter HOW he got to third.
Penalties fall into two types: equity penalties (such as nullifying the act obstruction,) or punitive penalties (such as ejection for USC.) In the first, the goal is to make the outcome as close as possible to what would have happened had the infraction not occurred. In the second, the goal is to deter the infraction from happening and preventing it from happening again.

This enforcement is an example of a penalty in equity being enforced as a punitive penalty due to the deliberate actions of the offender.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time Out Question... Refsmitty Football 4 Thu Oct 22, 2009 09:44am
Time-out Question (again) johnnyrao Basketball 2 Mon Jan 08, 2007 04:32pm
ok, time to ask another question LLPA13UmpDan Baseball 3 Sat Dec 16, 2006 08:05pm
question on "time-out" justmom Softball 6 Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:45pm
Another "Time out or no time out" question... Indy_Ref Basketball 6 Thu Jan 13, 2000 03:55am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1