|
|||
Last Time By Question
NFHS Question. Can anyone please explain the logic with regards to last-time-by not being applicable in casebook 8.2.6 SITUATION H: R1 is stealing on the pitch and a fly ball is hit to right field. R1 misses second base by (a) a few inches or (b) a greater distance because he cuts across the infield missing second base as he advanced toward third base. F9 catches the fly ball and R1 now retouches second base as he retreats to first base. F9’s throw is errant and R1 reaches first base ahead of the throw. The defense now appeals that R1 should be out as he did not initially touch second base. RULING: In (a), R1 is not declared out as he touched second on his last time by the base. In (b), R1 is out on appeal because a runner who misses a base by such a great distance in order to gain an advantage would still be vulnerable to appeal under the principle of last time by.
|
|
|||
Quote:
R1 has to take the same path (and the same amount of time) to retreat to second and then first in both situations. It shouldn't matter HOW he got to third. |
|
|||
Quote:
This enforcement is an example of a penalty in equity being enforced as a punitive penalty due to the deliberate actions of the offender.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?" |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time Out Question... | Refsmitty | Football | 4 | Thu Oct 22, 2009 09:44am |
Time-out Question (again) | johnnyrao | Basketball | 2 | Mon Jan 08, 2007 04:32pm |
ok, time to ask another question | LLPA13UmpDan | Baseball | 3 | Sat Dec 16, 2006 08:05pm |
question on "time-out" | justmom | Softball | 6 | Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:45pm |
Another "Time out or no time out" question... | Indy_Ref | Basketball | 6 | Thu Jan 13, 2000 03:55am |