![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Why? Because both 1st base and home plate can legally be overrun or overwalked without the runner necessarily being in jeopardy of an off-base out - see OBR 7.08(c) Exception. There can be no other reason to tag those runners except for an appeal that they missed the base in passing. Overrunning of either base is permitted, even on a base on balls award. OTOH, the tag of any runner who is past 1st base (rounded), 2nd or 3rd is in jeopardy of an off-base out under OBR 7.08(c) BUT any tag attempt might legitimately be seen as either a simple off-base tag out or an appeal play. Runners may not legally overrun or overwalk 2nd or 3rd base, or 1st base (rounded), without being in jeopardy of an off-base out. That dilemma is why Jaksa-Roder came up with the concept of Relaxed vs Unrelaxed action. Since most umpires cannot easily tell whether a tag during Unrelaxed action at 1st base (rounded), 2nd or 3rd base is an "unmistakable act" of appeal vs an off-base tag play, they suggested that umpires simply ignore the possiblity of an appeal during Unrelaxed action at those bases and call the result of the tag attempt on its merits. The defense may subsequently appeal any miss of the base during later Relaxed action, in order to gain the advantage of a force out. Hope this helps Cheers [Edited by Warren Willson on Sep 17th, 2003 at 11:15 AM]
__________________
Warren Willson |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|