![]() |
|
|||
NFHS Revised Legal Screening Rule
Given that the NFHS has added the words in bold to rule 4-40-1 and added 4.40.2 to the casebook to read:
4-40-1: A screen is legal action by a player who, while touching the playing court, without causing contact, delays or prevents an opponent from reaching a desired position. 4.40.2: SITUATION: A1 sets a stationary screen with one foot on or outside a boundary line. B1 makes contact with A1 in the torso. RULING: A blocking foul is ruled on A1 because a player may not be out-of-bounds while setting a legal screen. Is it correct to maintain and teach that: A. The NFHS screening rule now parallels NCAA-M and NCAA-W (both of whom say, "In establishing and maintaining legal screening tactics, the screener shall . . .be inbounds) in regards to a legal screening position requiring the screening player not to be out-of-bounds? B. Previously, the only NFHS enforcement for the SITUATION above would have been to rule a 9-3-3 violation for "leaving the court for an unauthorized reason"?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Revised Rule 4-42-5a | Freddy | Basketball | 50 | Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:56pm |
Is this legal in NFHS? | voiceoflg | Football | 20 | Thu Sep 26, 2013 01:01pm |
Can a secondary defender obtain a legal screening position in the Restricted Area? | MiamiWadeCounty | Basketball | 5 | Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:34am |
NBA Logo Legal in NFHS? | NathanRT | Basketball | 16 | Thu Feb 07, 2008 08:10pm |
NFHS OBS Revised Rule | whiskers_ump | Softball | 4 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:26pm |