RA plays (Video)

[JRutledge]

Play 1:



Play 2:



Peace

[SC Official]

1: Extremely close and I honestly can’t tell. If he was out it’s close enough that I don’t have a problem with C/T not coming in with information.

2: Straight up block. Good job by Roger not to point at the RA.

[Camron Rust]

1. His feet were clearly outside of the RA when he obtained LGP. He then moved laterally and his foot briefly crossed over the RA arc, but once you have LGP outside of the arc, it doesn't matter if you then step over it.

2. Charge (if there were no RA). In the path...check. Facing...check. Two feet down....check. Just because the shooter changes paths on the jump and doesn't hit him square doesn't negate already obtained LGP. I could go with a no-call however for that reason.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

1. His feet were clearly outside of the RA when he obtained LGP. He then moved laterally and his foot briefly crossed over the RA arc, but once you have LGP outside of the arc, it doesn't matter if you then step over it.

Agreed -- and even if it did matter (or there wasn't LGP before) then there is LGP after and outside the arc. I think this can be reviewed.

2. Charge (if there were no RA). In the path...check. Facing...check. Two feet down....check. Just because the shooter changes paths on the jump and doesn't hit him square doesn't negate already obtained LGP. I could go with a no-call however for that reason.

That's my thought on the first play through. I didn't watch beyond that.

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Play 2: Defender turns his body into shooter after shooter goes airborne.

My thoughts exactly, and I’m normally one for going charge when in doubt.

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

2. Charge (if there were no RA). In the path...check. Facing...check. Two feet down....check. Just because the shooter changes paths on the jump and doesn't hit him square doesn't negate already obtained LGP. I could go with a no-call however for that reason.

With all the clear charges that get shown on this forum that you think are blocks, I’m surprised this is your response.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by SC Official

My thoughts exactly, and I’m normally one for going charge when in doubt.

With all the clear charges that get shown on this forum that you think are blocks, I’m surprised this is your response.

That happens when you judge plays by the rules instead of by the seat of your pants.

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That happens when you judge plays by the rules instead of by the seat of your pants.

By this logic, you would agree that play #2 is a block.

[Raymond]

Play 2: Defender turns his body into shooter after shooter goes airborne.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk