[PaREF]

Originally Posted by Lurker"77;994791]It's the regular gray uniforms of UCLA that are at issue, right?

(e.g. [URL="http://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla-womens-volleyball/2016/12/10/13907412/ucla-womens-volleyball-faces-minnesota-in-ncaa-regional-final

http://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla-womens-volleyball/2016/12/10/13907412/ucla-womens-volleyball-faces-minnesota-in-ncaa-regional-final[/URL]


or

http://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla-wom...s-southern-cal

)


I thought I read from another discussion that the questionable libero top was of similar color to the spandex (and presumably other team jersey tops), which would be more debatable than some television shots would indicate. I honestly couldn't say if that was contrasting (but don't get paid to purchase uniforms or officiate under most rule sets). If the potentially offending jersey matches the blue spandex, play on or not?

But, I also wonder why a pink jersey is present in both of the shots I pulled up online with these uniforms in use in other matches.

I saw other pictures from this season where the UCLA libero was wearing a white shirt. Not sure why she was not made to wear it for the Minnesota match. When I first turned on the match I wondered why they weren't using a libero. It wasn't until really looking hard that I saw the difference between the grey and blue uniform tops. I heard that the contrast was more visible in person than on TV.