Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt S.
I believe the arrow would stay where it's at after the throw-in for the foul is complete...here's why:
1. 6-4-5 states that "If either team fouls during an alternating-possession throw-in, it does not cause the throw-in team to lose the possession arrow."
2. If there was merely a foul by the defense, you wouldn't change the arrow after the ensuing throw-in, right?
Team A had control for a throw-in (albeit an AP throw in), there was a double foul, which, by rule, does not cause the throw-in team to lose the arrow, and the POI is a throw in by team A, since they had control at the time of the double foul.
Bob--we should've spent some time on this one at Rock Valley!!!
|
With apologies to Dickens, If the rule means that,the rule is a ass - a idiot.
A double foul should give neither team an advantage. If A gets the TI and the arrow, it gains an advantage from the double foul occurring: an extra throw in. While it appears that a hyper-technical reading could get one there, it makes no sense. Certainly there are correct interpretations that don't really make sense, but lack of sense is certainly worth considering as part of the parsing. . .