Quote:
Originally Posted by Stat-Man
MTDSr:
I finally got my rule/casebook set yesterday, so I was eager to go through to review the changes and this discussion item for myself.
Although Play 2 is covered by the revised case 9.12.B, Play 1 is covered by case 7.5.2.A (item a) where the ruling is to award the throw-in at the nearest spot. This implies that if the traveling violation occurs in the so-called "rocket-ship," the throw-in spot would be on the baseline and not the sideline at the FTLE.
Does this mean we only use the sideline FTLE for a final free throw attempt nullified by violation and nothing else?  |
My stance is that we should await word from the NFHS when they publish their annual "Interpretations" (usually mid-October, lately the platform for corrections on unintended revisions) to see if they admit to this as an error or not. If not, there's a lot of other stuff that mandates revising. Which is why I'm guessing this is an error.