
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 01:05pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 81
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy
Sorry, I meant 6-4-5, which says, "The opportunity to make an AP throw-in is lost if the throw-in team violates. . . . If the defensive team commits a violation during the throw-in, the possession arrow is not switched."
So, even if the word "legally" is removed from 4-42-5a, what 6-4-5 says means everything is the same as it's always been.
I prefer that they had left the word "legally" there, but someone must have said, "Hey, since 6-4-5 covers this eventuality, let's just remove this word." Duh.
Does that make sense to you?
|
There it is. Ok that makes sense now. We kept looking at 6.4.2 last night thinking "what the heck is this guy talking about" ha. Man I just don't understand why they would take the word "legally" out. What does that gain? If anything, it made it more confusing to me. But I see it now.
|