Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef
I think that rule then and pardon my French is bullshit. On what grounds can you eject if you don't have enough to have an out and a dead ball? The two should be inclusive to each other
|
Ever hear of unsportsmanlike conduct?
They used to have an out in the old regime when MB & HP justified the call with a long stretch of rule interpretations.
In 2009, I proposed a change which removed the words "has the ball" which would result in an INT ruling including an out for the runner who creates flagrant contact with a possible subsequent ejection.