Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21
That makes sense. Imagine this conversation...
Coach: Why did you call a foul on A2?
Official: It was a rebounding foul on him.
Coach: What rebound?
Official: Well, if it wasn't for the foul against the shooter, and the shot missed, there would have been a rebound.
Coach: But there was no rebound, so how can there be a foul on it?
Yeah, I'm sure you can explain a simultaneous foul and whatnot. Just thought that conversation would be funny. Or not.. you can decide. LOL
|
That's why you use rule book terms, either a pushing or holding foul, in your conversations. Then we don't have to deal with this silliness.