Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan
Play #1: The defender embellished a bit but I'll go with an illegal screen. Whether the defender was moving as the screen was set was so close I can give the defense the benefit of the doubt.
Play #2: Yeah, kind of baffling why the L/new Twas still looking into the lane when Louisville gained control of the ball. I'd have to think it was the T/new L who initiated talk of a review. If the C had seen it I'm thinking he would've had a late whistle.
|
Same Duke player is involved in both plays?
Illegal screen is against a player with a history of these.
However, watch #3 in other games - he's also dirty... He's working on his own 30 for 30, "I hate Christian Laettner" story.
1. Play on!
2. Good get... by the monitor.