In the below play, since the foul happened before the change of team possession, doesn't R have to decline the penalty to keep possession (and their TD). My reasoning are the following rules refernces.
Rule 5-2-2 & 3
ART. 2 . . . When a foul occurs during a scrimmage down and before any change of team possession, and before a receiver is first to touch a scrimmage kick while it is beyond the neutral zone, the ball belongs to A after enforcement. The number of the next down is the same as that of the down during which the foul occurred unless penalty acceptance includes a first down or loss of down, or the enforcement or the advance results in a first down.
ART. 3 . . . When a foul occurs prior to a scrimmage down, or simultaneously with the snap, the number of the next down after enforcement is the same as the number established before the foul occurred, unless enforcement for a foul by B results in a first down.
FUND II.3 - If R is first to touch a scrimmage kick beyond the neutral zone, a new series will be awarded the team in possession at end of the down, unless there was a foul before the kick crossed the expanded neutral zone and the penalty was accepted, or there was a double foul or there was an inadvertent whistle during the kick following the touching by R.
PLAY
"...K is illegally in motion at the snap. K's punt is caught by R at his 40 yard line and returned for a TD. TD stands and gets to have the IM penalty enforced on the try. Doesn't seem fair. We were discussing a possible solution that would allow the penalty to be enforced from the succeeding spot (try) only if (a.) it was a personal foul, or (b.) it occurs after the final change of possession.
Bob M. "
|