Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:04pm
|
|
Courageous When Prudent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,934
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyu2
No. I'm having a brain cramp regarding 9-9-2 which I think is the applicable rule (While in player and team control in its back court, a player shall not cause the ball to go from back court>front court>back court . . .) However, during the interrupted dribble there is no player control. Even so, the ball went from back court>front court>back court all while there was team control. Maybe I'm distracted by the Browns game.
|
BC violation. Maintaining PC is not needed in order to violate.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
|