Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad
I'm interested in what others may think of a T here. While I'm an advocate of not holding them back, this is a situation where I may just let it go -- depending how/what the coach says.
With how horrible the sportsmanship was from the two ejected players I'd have to imagine something happened before their shoves.
Seems like I would have to have something good to have a T here. If he's just protective over his players and voices he think I missed something previously...
|
Just to be clear, it wasn't the ejected players' coach that was T'd as your post implied, it was the visiting coach...the one whose player was shoved.
We are discussing two separate issues here - one is a matter of rule, the other a matter of judgement.
The question the OP originally posed was if the penalties for the T's were administered correctly by rule, and I agree with numerous others that they were not.
The second issue that has evolved in the discussion here is with the T on the visiting coach (note that the OP did not question the T on the VC, just how the penalties were administered). This is a matter of severity of conduct as judged by the game officials - it's one of those HTBT situations.....
If the game officials judged the coach's comments as worthy of a T, I have no problem with that. As to whether it was worthy of a flagrant T and ejection, that's another judgement they have to make based on the situation.
Regardless of what might have prompted a coach's unsportsmanlike action, his conduct stands on it's own and you penalize accordingly.
It's easy to be an "arm chair" official with 20/20 hindsight, but in reality only the game officials present have the immediate knowledge to make those judgements.