Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Whether this act is flagrant or not shouldn't have anything to do with the player's success or failure to make contact with his opponent.
For example, a punch that misses and a punch that lands are both flagrant.
In my opinion, if you were going to issue a flagrant personal foul had the tripper been successful, then you should have issued a flagrant technical foul for attempt which didn't make contact.
|
Fair enough. Coach never said a word, kid got up and went directly to bench and was subbed for. He knew what he did. My initial thought was a technical foul, but did consider ejection.