Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
But isn't that one of the purposes of signals, to communicate the "call" to partners, table personnel, coaches, players, and fans?
It is, according to the NFHS:
"Signaling is an essential aspect of officiating and, through its use, decisions and information are relayed to players, coaches, and spectators."
|
If fans don't understand what the signals mean, then the way I communicate them won't make any difference. My point was that Ohio's stance makes no sense: if fans comprehend what "hand behind the head" means, then it would be reasonable to assume that they would understand what a punch in the opposite direction means. If they don't understand one, they're not going to understand the other. I just don't get telling officials they "can't use a certain signal" because "the fans won't understand it." If the fans really care about understanding the signals, they can study the chart.