View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 25, 2015, 04:27pm
TimTaylor TimTaylor is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,273
Camron is correct.

There is a casebook situation that specifically addresses this, and that interpretation remains in effect until it it specifically changed, which NFHS has not done.

The screening rule is irrelevant in the situation being discussed.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons - for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup!

Last edited by TimTaylor; Sun Jan 25, 2015 at 06:59pm.
Reply With Quote