Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
You're on the right track. In NFHS, it could also be an intentional foul, which is the same as flagrant minus the disqualification. That's a judgment on whether the contact was excessive versus savage/violent.
And to muddy the waters even more, if B1 were to retaliate and get a T, now your flagrant foul is part of a false double foul.
|
Well let's see what we'd do if this happened.
I was always taught to shoot FTs in the order the fouls occurred.
This means B1 would shoot the flagrant FTs (unless the T was his second (or 5th personal) in which case his substitute would shoot)
Then A1s sub would shoot the technicals.
Now we give the ball to team A at the division line because of technical foul procedure.
Please tell me I got all of that
