Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
1. The comparison is not valid. No one is going to jail over a technical foul.
2. These are not contradictory. One can use magic words without using profanity.
3. It's not our business what was said, I'm sure it's in Hess' report to Adams.
|
1. The comparison is that there are conflicting sides of what happened. Video and/or audio can, in a lot of cases, determine which side is more truthful.
2. What is in Hess' report is Hess' version of what happened. And if Gottfrieds' report of what happened is totally opposite, then what?
I never said it was OUR business. I believe I said it would be something that could be used by conference assignors and school administration. Nobody should have anything to hide. Why would this be such a big deal?