|
Is the confusion from terminology of the rule change explanation?
A team could "play shorthanded" if someone leaves regardless of how many in the lineup, so the shorthanded rule "applies".
The forfeit provision that has applied in the past would cause a forfeit if the team was "short" more than one player, based on the original requirement of max. 9 batters. That math meant playing with 8 batting was ok, less than 8 was a forfeit.
The new "rule" (or lack of it) to allow multiple extra batters then allows multiple short hands down to a minimum of 8.
That implies the possibility of multiple shorthanded outs in the lineup, perhaps an entire inning.
.................................................. .............
Comments:
It would be better to stick with limiting shorthanded to one short.
LRAMBF
Soccer minimum is 7.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|