Thread: What you got?
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 18, 2014, 11:06pm
Robert Goodman Robert Goodman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by ump33 View Post
The term "opponent" is identified in Rule 2-43. It says nothing about the opponent has to be one of the 11 players only that the opponent is "the defense, B or R".
I looked there too, but it uses the word "opponent" only in terms of "the team". It doesn't say anything about which individuals compose a team. I could take it just as easily as limited to players as I could to include non-players. I've a feeling they meant it one way or the other, but not sure which.

After writing the above, I found something else that clarifies it in this case but leaves some similar scenarios vague: the definition of "substitute" in Fed 2-32-15, identifying him as a "team member". So it would make the action in the original case posed a personal foul (UR by a player vs. an opponent who is a substitute), but leave it unclear in the case of other non-players.

Last edited by Robert Goodman; Tue Nov 18, 2014 at 11:20pm.
Reply With Quote