Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
RSBQ is and always has been a guideline, even though that acronym does not appear in the books anywhere. (does it?) "....contact which hinders an opponent from performing normal maneuvers....." conveys pretty much the same message, does it not?
|
RSBQ is a philosophy on how to consistently apply the written rules. I would never suggest that RSBQ is not about what is already written in the current rules. And it also considers 4-27 so that you just do not call a foul because there is contact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
But something has drastically changed. Namely the addition of 10-6-12 which is obviously intended to go above and beyond that which was stated above.
|
Well this is
NCAA 10-1-4:
Quote:
The following acts constitute a foul when committed against a player with the ball:
a. Keeping a hand or forearm on an opponent;
b. Putting two hands on an opponent
c. Continually jabbing an opponent by extending an arm(s) and placing a hand or forearm on an opponent;
d. Using an arm bar to impede the progress of a dribbler.
|
While
NF 10-6-12 says:
Quote:
The following acts constitute a foul when committed against a ball handler/dribbler:
a. Placing two hands on a dribbler
b. Placing an extended arm bar on a player.
c. Placing and keeping a hand on a dribbler
d. Contacting the player more than once with the same hand or alternating hands.
|
These are basically the same thing or language.
The NCAA does a better job through Rule 10-1 to describe when is or isn't a foul throughout the rest of the section.
Peace