View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 11, 2014, 12:08pm
Freddy Freddy is offline
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Your Suggestion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Got my book in the mail yesterday. They did not, of course, fix the problem with the team control and it's impact on the backcourt calls in the immediate aftermath of a throw in.

By a strict reading of the rule, some very standard plays should be called violations. Unless, of course, one happens to read the handouts or the old notices, and knows differently.
Are you suggesting that 4-12-3c is insufficient, needing perhaps the words "for purposes of determining the consequences of a foul by the throw-in team", or something to that effect? Would you agree with that?

Did you notice how the new 4.12.2B seems to try to make up for whatever might still be lacking in the rulebook? Do you agree with all that?

They did take the "or" out of 9-9-1, which clarified that somewhat, or at least made the mud clearer. Do you agree with that?

(I'm still ticked off at "predominant color of the uniform" in 3-5-3b and 3-5-4a, and the obvious error in 3.5.4 if they're gonna dictate 3-5-3b and 3-5-4a. Not merely disappointed. Papa-Oscar'ed.)
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call

Last edited by Freddy; Sat Oct 11, 2014 at 12:18pm.
Reply With Quote