Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
There were a few case plays/interps issued when the AP arrow rule was altered so that a team retained the arrow if the opponent kicked the ball on the initial touch of the throw-in pass.
One of the plays dealt with a player catching/touching the throw-in pass while standing on a boundary line. It said the touching was legal and the arrow switched, but it was an OOB violation and the opponent's ball at that new location.
From the above play, one can deduce that the NFHS ruling is that touching the ball with the hands (not a closed fist) is a legal action in itself. There may be other restrictions such as OOB, jump ball parameters, BI/GT, etc. which cause the touch to be a violation, but that doesn't mean that the touch isn't proper.
It may be parsing in a legal or exercise in mental logic, but that's the rationale for why such a touch would be timed.
|
What do you mean the "touch would be timed"?
If the touch is a violation, the clock, if running, stops. If it isn't running, it doesn't start.
I seem to remember a spirited discussion with Jurassic Referee about this years ago.