Quote:
Originally posted by Theisey
Ed,
Will not see any books until mid-August, but from what I've seen posted here and elsewhere, there are a few rule omissions in some key places that should have been altered for the PSK change.
That being said, the case play sited is NOT a PSK situation as the kick part of the play has ended. Maybe the NF is just trying to point that out so that some official doesn't try to enforce the hold from the end-of-kick spot in error.
Just a thought.
|
Think that is exactly what they were trying to convey.
Funny because at last week's football meeting when that play was discussed many thought PSK enforcement was from the end of the down.
Also, As I read further in Comments on the 2003 Revisions the principle of "clean hands" has been revised to say on a PSK the hands must be "clean" when the ball crosses the expanded neutral zone.