Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Rut, can you read at all?
The case number was in the subject line of the original e-mail.
From the second e-mail:
The main point of contention is what happens when the two officials, unfortunately, mistakenly give opposite preliminary signals and whether this changes the equation. Please advise.
Her: It does not change the equation. They still should come together and talk to make a final decision. If the decision is to go one way over another then that person goes to the table to report. If no one wants to give in, then they go to the table to report both fouls.
 |
She either did not read the play or she did not understand why you asked the question. And you did her no favors by leaving out the most important issue in this debate in your original email. And you are the only one here that things "calls" does not indicate a signal of some kind. As stated, she fell back on her experience at another level and was not aware of what it either said in the casebook by her comments or she would have made it very clear what should be done.
You can say whatever you like about me, but you are the only one arguing this point of view. Do not get mad at me because you are trying to be argumentative about how this is clearly understood. You are the only person that read this that I have ever come in contact with that is confused about what this case play does. I have even shown people after the fact and no one goes to the place you do about this play. I wonder why?
Peace