Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
I could see doing this with a shot clock, depending on who my partner was. No way I'm doing it without one, though, with only a 1 second lag.
|
As I said, it would be extremely rare (and in fact, I've NEVER done this in 21 years of officiating), but why exactly wouldn't you call this?
Everybody can see 1:00 on the clock after the time-out. You can see the ball possessed immediately inbounds. And you can see the clock hit 0:49. It's obviously a violation. It's just as obvious as if you had a shot clock, except that it's not on a separate clock.
If you
would do it with a shot clock, I don't see the rationale for
not doing it without one.