View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2013, 09:58am
Zoochy Zoochy is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp View Post
That make sense.



I disagree that substitutes for an injured free throw shooter is precedent here. I can agree with what Bob is saying in that absent the injury, NFHS would require the two original jumpers to jump again.
I don't think the FT situation is analogous.
I do not know NCAAW, but for NFHS the 2 involved in the held ball situation will be the new jumpers. So if one of them is injured I would say the substitute would be the jumper.
Reply With Quote